Friday, September 22, 2006

Announcing The First Annual "Bowling for Bloggers Bonanza"

I'd like to personally extend an invitation to bloggers and non-bloggers alike to join The Boling Alley for the First Annual Bowling for Bloggers Bonanza on Wednesday, November 8th at the world reknown Lexington Lanes located on Highway 1 in the thriving metropolis of Lexington, SC.

We'll unmask some of SC's most infamous bloggers in an attempt to bring the blogosphere into the biosphere. It's an event you'll certainly not want to miss. More details to come in the weeks ahead. Please RSVP by posting a comment.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Paging Mr. Folks, Paging Mr. Folks

I’m not one for personal politics. I like to think of myself as a pretty nice guy, perhaps to a flaw – although I am sure there are others who would argue the opposite. For me, it’s disheartening that my first blog since summer must be one of self-defense.

Recently, Will Folks personally attacked me and the firm where I work. I suppose being attacked for the company you keep is one of the pitfalls of actually having a job which is more than any of us can say for Mr. Folks.

Before I let my anger completely get the best of me allow me to explain why I feel this rant is required. Yesterday, in his blog, Mr. Folks made glaringly false statements regarding the State Senate District Five race. Provided below is a brief excerpt of one of the more interesting comments:

… Upstate Rep. Lewis Vaughn is facing a tougher than expected fight from a previously-disbarred lawyer named Kathleen Jennings Gresham. Vaughn, a strident supporter of school choice and one of FITS' favorites [SIC] legislators, should be running away with this race, but the latest polls show him hanging onto a lead that's just outside the margin of error.

Apparently, Mr. Folks is turning to the same pollsters who declared George W. Bush would fall to John Kerry, Rick Quinn would trounce Thomas Ravenel and Bob Staton would strike a crushing blow to Karen Floyd.

As much as we think blogging actually matters, voters in Senate District Five must have missed yesterday’s edition of FITS since Vaughn received 47.65% of the vote while Jennings Gresham struggled to gain 16% – so much for the margin of error.

Looking to the runoff, Vaughn will carry with him a dominating eighteen point lead over the next closest vote getter.

Given the outcome, I hope we can gain a glimpse into Mr. Folks’ character. If he has the courage to admit when he’s wrong, I believe it’s possible that he still holds on to his last remaining shreds of professional respect.

But, in the meantime, I’ll wait for the personal attacks…

Monday, July 24, 2006

The False Courage of Anonymity

“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain,” said the Wizard to Dorothy and her marooned band of misfits. Courage is easy, and anonymity is security in the blog world. Oh, how computers can make lions out of cowards.

Friday, I read a blog on FITS in which the author(s) of the site answered specific questions as to their inclination on the issue of Homosexual Marriage. (From what I gathered, FITS opposes the practice in principle, but does not believe government should have a say over the matter.) In several of the comments given in response to the statement, posters preferred to keep their identities hidden.

It is undoubtedly the security of being undiscovered that afforded the commentators such bravado. Cowering behind the curtain that separates revealed and hidden, posters are free to show their true colors employing a vast array of slurs to describe homosexuals and each other. From the comfort of keyboards, bloggers can litter webpages with verbiage reminiscent of writings found on the stalls of bathrooms throughout America’s high schools.

Other than being a nuisance, the overuse of anonymous posting shortchanges all of us for a couple of reasons; it allows posters to make claims without having to do their homework and there is no accountability for the things said or the opinions created.

These two facts mean that the nature of the claims made by Anonymous or other clever but unrevealing monikers isn’t all that it could be.

In this particular case, rather than hosting a discussion of the issue at hand, the conversation quickly turned to little more than middle school lockerroom name-calling. Personal attacks replaced sound judgment. And if bloggers are, as some claim, the most informed and least apathetic members of the population, then why would they choose to turn a perfectly good discussion on an important social issue into a series of hostile bombardments on one another?

The alternative to such bickering and cowardice is, however, quite promising.

If someone is willing to put his or her name on a post, then you can bet one of two things; he has done his research and gathered the facts or the individual in question is truly brave and opening himself to justified criticism. No longer will bloggers just espouse rhetoric that they have heard and taken as gospel.

If posters are encouraged to reveal their identities, then we could consequently see more thorough and more thought provoking posts, rather than the rumor mill gossip that serves no public interest.

Consequently, as a trade off, we would also expect to see fewer posts. But I, for one, would see that trade off as an acceptable casualty realizing that quality in these instances would far outweigh the benefits of quantity.

What it really boils down to is this: if you have something worth saying then you shouldn’t only be comfortable putting your money where your mouth is, but you should be confident and firm in your convictions and proud of your statement.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

The New Democratic Doctrine of Religious Outreach

I’m on vacation, but it’s raining. My mother-in-law saved the USA Today for me and suggested I read an op-ed by Barack Obama. The piece entitled Politicians Need Not Abandon Religion.

Obama opens his argument by stating, “My faith shapes my values, but applying those values to policymaking must be done with principles that are accessible to all people, religious or not. Even so, those who enter the public square are not required to leave their beliefs at the door.”

But, before one can digest the meat of his thesis, Obama immediately lays into “conservative leaders such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson who tell evangelical Christians that Democrats disrespect their values and dislike their church, while suggesting that religious Americans care only about issues such as abortion and gay marriage.”

So what as Republicans can we glean from all this religious rhetoric from the new poster boy of the DNC?

I believe it is this: Out of desperation, the Democrats have adopted a new religious doctrine that consists of two simple tactics for out flanking Republicans:

The first pillar states that it is advisable to speak of God and to perhaps even include the occasional religious reference so long as one continues to adhere to the time honored liberal code that states there is but one truth; there are no absolutes. While the second pillar seeks to villainies leaders of the Christian community.

Obama complies with the first requirement by delivering a quasi-testimonial in which he shares how he came to believe that religion cannot be separated from politics shortly after his 2004 Senate campaign. I have to give the communication gurus at the DNC kudos for cleverly utilizing personal testimony as a mechanism for appealing to the faithful.

But, it is the second pillar of this strategy that will continue to cause problems for the National Democrat Party. While calling for the need to unite under a banner of common, universal values, Obama turns to attacking the men and women of the Christian right saying that unless Democrats begin discussing religion then “others will fill the vacuum: those with the most insular views of faith, or those who cynically use religion to justify partisan ends.”

But, here is what the Dems don’t understand. People of faith believe in truth. We are unwilling to compromise the truth for convenience and we are perfectly willing to fight for it no matter the political liability. Folks like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, while I may not always agree with them, should be applauded for not backing down from what they believe simply to appeal to the court of public opinion. As conservatives, our politics is shaped by our beliefs, not the other way around.

If there is one clear insight we can garner from this new Democrat strategy it is that liberals are willing to adopt religion in order to gain votes. They are content to mention God in a vain attempt to appeal to the larger electorate.

Monday, July 03, 2006

A Thought for Independence Day...

*Please note, I did not write this (which may be all the reason more to read it).

It was a glorious morning. The sun was shining and the wind was from the southeast. Up especially early, a tall, bony, redheaded young Virginian found time to buy a new thermometer, for which he paid three pounds, fifteen shillings. He also bought gloves for Martha, his wife, who was ill at home.

Thomas Jefferson arrived early at the statehouse. The temperature was 72.5: and the horseflies weren't nearly so bad at that hour. It was a lovely room, very large, with gleaming white walls. The chairs were comfortable. Facing the single door were two brass fireplaces, but they would not be used today. The moment the door was shut, and it was always kept locked, the room became an oven. The tall windows were shut, so that loud quarreling voices could not be heard by passersby. Small openings atop the windows allowed a slight stir of air, and also a large number of horseflies. Jefferson records that "the horseflies were dexterous in finding necks, and the silk of stocking was as nothing to them."

All discussion was punctuated by the slap of hands on necks. On the wall at the back, facing the President's desk, was a panoply--consisting of a drum, swords, and banners seized from Fort Ticonderoga the previous year. Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold had captured the place, shouting that they were taking it "in the name if the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress!"

Now Congress got to work, promptly taking up an emergency measure about which there was discussion but no dissension. "Resolved: That an application be made to the Committee of Safety of Pennsylvania for a supply of flints for the troops at New York." Then Congress transformed itself into a committee of the whole, The Declaration of Independence was read aloud once more, and debate resumed.

Though Jefferson was the best writer of all of them, he had been somewhat verbose. Congress hacked the excess away. They did a good job, as a side-by-side comparison of the rough draft and the final text shows. They cut the phrase "by a self-assumed power." "Climb" was replaced by "must read," then "must" was eliminated, then the whole sentence, and soon the whole paragraph was cut. Jefferson groaned as they continued what he later called "their depredations." "Inherent and inalienable rights" came out "certain unalienable rights," and to this day no one knows who suggested the elegant change. A total of 86 alterations were made. Almost 500 words were eliminated, leaving 1,337. At last, after three days of wrangling, the document was put to a vote. Here in this hall Patrick Henry had once thundered: "I am no longer a Virginian, Sir, but an American."

But today the loud, sometimes bitter argument stilled, and without fanfare the vote was taken from north to south by colonies, as was the custom. On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was adopted. There were no trumpets blown. No one stood on his chair and cheered. The afternoon was waning and Congress had no thought of delaying the full calendar of routine business on its hands. For several hours they worked on many other problems before adjourning for the day.

What kind of men were the 56 signers who adopted the Declaration of Independence and who, by their signing, committed an act of treason against the Crown? To each of you the names Franklin, Adams, Hancock, and Jefferson are almost as familiar as household words. Most of us, however, know nothing of the other signers. Who were they? What happened to them? I imagine that many of you are somewhat surprised at the names not there: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Patrick Henry. All were elsewhere. Ben Franklin was the only really old man. Eighteen were under 40; three were in their 20s. Of the 56, almost half--24--were judges and lawyers. Eleven were merchants, 9 were land-owners and farmers, and the remaining 12 were doctors, ministers, and politicians.

With only a few exceptions, such as Samuel Adams of Massachusetts, these were men of substantial property. All but two had families. The vast majority were men of education and standing in their communities. They had economic security as few men had in the 18th century. Each had more to lose from revolution than he had to gain by it. John Hancock, one of the richest men in America, already had a price of 500 pounds on his head. He signed in enormous letter so "that his Majesty could now read his name without glasses and could now double the reward."

Ben Franklin wryly noted: "Indeed we must all hang together, otherwise we shall most assuredly hang separately." Fat Benjamin Harrison of Virginia told tiny Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: "With me it will all be over in a minute, but you, you will be dancing on air an hour after I am gone." These men knew what they risked. The penalty for treason was death by hanging. And remember: a great British fleet was already at anchor in New York Harbor. They were sober men.

There were no dreamy-eyed intellectuals or draft card burners here. They were far from hot-eyed fanatics, yammering for an explosion. They simply asked for the status quo. It was change they resisted. It was equality with the mother country they desired. It was taxation with representation they sought. They were all conservatives, yet they rebelled. It was principle, not property, that had brought these men to Philadelphia. Two of them became presidents of the United States. Seven of them became state governors. One died in office as vice president of the United States. Several would go on to be U.S. Senators. One, the richest man in America, in 1828 founded the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad.

One, a delegate from Philadelphia, was the only real poet, musician and philosopher of the signers (it was he, Francis Hopkinson--not Betsy Ross--who designed the United States flag). Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, had introduced the resolution to adopt the Declaration of Independence in June of 1776. He was prophetic is his concluding remarks: "Why then sir, why do we longer delay? Why still deliberate? Let this happy day give birth to an American Republic. Let her arise not to devastate and to conquer but to reestablish the reign of peace and law. The eyes of Europe are fixed upon us. She demands of us a living example of freedom that may exhibit a contrast in the felicity of the citizen to the ever increasing tyranny which desolates her polluted shores. She invites us to prepare an asylum where the unhappy may find solace, and the persecuted repose. If we are not this day wanting in our duty, the names of the American legislators of 1776 will be placed by posterity at the side of all of those whose memory has been and ever will be dear to virtuous men and good citizens."

Though the resolution was formally adopted July 4, it was not until July 8 that two of the states authorized their delegates to sign, and it was not until August 2 that the signers met at Philadelphia to actually put their names to the Declaration.

William Ellery, delegate from Rhode Island, was curious to see the signers' faces as they committed this supreme act of personal courage. He saw some men sign quickly, "but in no face was he able to discern real fear." Stephen Hopkins, Ellery's colleague from Rhode Island, was a man past 60. As he signed with a shaking pen, he declared: "My hand trembles, but my heart does not."

Even before the list was published, the British marked down every member of Congress suspected of having put his name to treason. All of them became the objects of vicious manhunts. Some were taken. Some, like Jefferson, had narrow escapes. All who had property or families near British strongholds suffered. Francis Lewis, New York delegate, saw his home plundered and his estates, in what is now Harlem, completely destroyed by British soldiers. Mrs. Lewis was captured and treated with great brutality. Though she was later exchanged for two British prisoners through the efforts of Congress, she died from the effects of her abuse.

William Floyd, another New York delegate, was able to escape with his wife and children across Long Island Sound to Connecticut, where they lived as refugees without income for seven years. When they came home, they found a devastated ruin. Phillips Livingstone had all his great holdings in New York confiscated and his family driven out of their home. Livingstone died in 1778 still working in Congress for the cause.

Louis Morris, the fourth New York delegate, saw all his timber, crops, and livestock taken. For seven years he was barred from his home and family. John Hart of Trenton, New Jersey, risked his life to return home to see his dying wife. Hessian soldiers rode after him, and he escaped in the woods. While his wife lay on her deathbed, the soldiers ruined his farm and wrecked his Homestead. Hart, 65, slept in caves and woods as he was hunted across the countryside. When at long last, emaciated by hardship, he was able to sneak home, he found his wife had already been buried, and his 13 children taken away. He never saw them again. He died a broken man in 1779, without ever finding his family.

Dr. John Witherspoon, signer, was president of the College of New Jersey, later called Princeton. The British occupied the town of Princeton, and billeted troops in the college. They trampled and burned the finest college library in the country.

Judge Richard Stockton, another New Jersey delegate signer, had rushed back to his estate in an effort to evacuate his wife and children. The family found refuge with friends, but a sympathizer betrayed them. Judge Stockton was pulled from bed in the night and brutally beaten by the arresting soldiers. Thrown into a common jail, he was deliberately starved. Congress finally arranged for Stockton's parole, but his health was ruined. The judge was released as an invalid, when he could no longer harm the British cause. He returned home to find his estate looted and did not live to see the triumph of the evolution. His family was forced to live off charity.

Robert Morris, merchant prince of Philadelphia, delegate and signer, met Washington's appeals and pleas for money year after year. He made and raised arms and provisions which made it possible for Washington to cross the Delaware at Trenton. In the process he lost 150 ships at sea, bleeding his own fortune and credit almost dry.

George Clymer, Pennsylvania signer, escaped with his family from their home, but their property was completely destroyed by the British in the Germantown and Brandywine campaigns.

Dr. Benjamin Rush, also from Pennsylvania, was forced to flee to Maryland. As a heroic surgeon with the army, Rush had several narrow escapes.

John Morton, a Tory in his views previous to the debate, lived in a strongly loyalist area of Pennsylvania. When he came out for independence, most of his neighbors and even some of his relatives ostracized him. He was a sensitive and troubled man, and many believed this action killed him. When he died in 1777, his last words to his tormentors were: "Tell them that they will live to see the hour when they shall acknowledge it [the signing] to have been the most glorious service that I rendered to my country."

William Ellery, Rhode Island delegate, saw his property and home burned to the ground. Thomas Lynch, Jr., South Carolina delegate, had his health broken from privation and exposures while serving as a company commander in the military. His doctors ordered him to seek a cure in the West Indies and on the voyage He and his young bride were drowned at sea. Edward Rutledge, Arthur Middleton, and Thomas Heyward, Jr., the other three South Carolina signers, were taken by the British in the siege of Charleston. They were carried as prisoners of war to St. Augustine, Florida, where they were singled out for indignities. They were exchanged at the end of the war, the British in the meantime having completely devastated their large land holdings and estates.

Thomas Nelson, signer of Virginia, was at the front in command of the Virginia military forces. With British General Charles Cornwallis in Yorktown, fire from 70 heavy American guns began to destroy Yorktown piece by piece. Lord Cornwallis and his staff moved their headquarters into Nelson's palatial home. While American cannonballs were making a shambles of the town, the house of Governor Nelson remained untouched. Nelson turned in rage to the American gunners and asked, "Why do you spare my home?" They replied, "Sir, out of respect to you." Nelson cried, "Give me the cannon!" and fired on his magnificent home himself, smashing it to bits. But Nelson's sacrifice was not quite over. He had raised $2 million for the Revolutionary cause by pledging his own estates. When the loans came due, a newer peacetime Congress refused to honor them, and Nelson's property was forfeited. He was never reimbursed. He died, impoverished, a few years later at the age of 50.

Lives, fortunes, honor Of those 56 who signed the Declaration of Independence, nine died of wounds or hardships during the war. Five were captured and imprisoned, in each case with brutal treatment. Several lost wives, sons or entire families. One lost his 13 children. Two wives were brutally treated. All were at one time or another the victims of manhunts and driven from their homes. Twelve signers had their homes completely burned. Seventeen lost everything they owned. Yet not one defected or went back on his pledged word. Their honor, and the nation they sacrificed so much to create, is still intact.

And, finally, there is the New Jersey signer, Abraham Clark. He gave two sons to the officer corps in the Revolutionary Army. They were captured and sent to the infamous British prison hulk afloat in New York harbor known as the hell ship "Jersey," where 11,000 American captives were to die. The younger Clarks were treated with a special brutality because of their father. One was put in solitary and given no food. With the end almost in sight, with the war almost won, no one could have blamed Abraham Clark for acceding to the British request when they offered him his sons' lives if he would recant and come out for the King and parliament. The utter despair in this man's heart, the anguish in his very soul, must reach out to each one of us down through 200 years with his answer: "No."

The 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence proved by their every deed that they made no idle boast when they composed the most magnificent curtain line in history. "And for the support of this Declaration with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor."

Thursday, June 29, 2006


I’ll Say This About the Communists; They Sure Can Put on One Heck of a Parade!

Ignore for a few moments the deaths of millions, the starvation of women and children and take a look at what Communism has going for it; those glorious parades!

I don’t know what firm handles the event planning for those things, but they will undoubtedly be coveted by all the major presidential candidates.

Organizing thousands of banner waving, goosestepping pinkos can’t be easy. I reckon it’s a good thing the parade coordinators have “pain of death” as a nice incentive for citizen attendance and cooperation. And you can be assured no candy is tossed from moving vehicles on the streets of Pyongyang.